My resume was still doing work after I sent it.

Two weeks earlier, I applied for two infrastructure jobs. I used Beatport as the clearest example of what I managed: nine web servers, five database servers, 30 terabytes of storage, about 80 terabytes of traffic each month, and uptime above 99.99 percent.

The resume stayed visible online.

Two weeks later, one recruiter wrote about an assistant technical manager position. Another message mentioned a technical director role. The titles sounded useful. I did not know whether either conversation would go anywhere.

Neither message began with a specific conversation already in progress. They found the resume first and used the title to start one.

I was already leading technology at Beatport. The online resume was still visible to recruiters.

The company was growing, and the systems responsibility was real. The resume described that work in enough detail for searches to keep finding it.

It also created noise. Recruiters could find a few matching words and send a title. Infrastructure, Linux, Windows, network, storage, director. A message based on those terms was not the same as an offer.

The resume remained online.

The numbers were more useful than the title. They showed the size of the environment underneath it: web servers, database servers, storage, traffic, and uptime.

I did not reply in the thread. There was no interview or offer attached to either message.

The direct fact is smaller. I had a growing system to run, a resume online, and recruiter messages still finding it.

Archive